I strongly support this draft. It must be useful for the implementers
to develop IKEv2 to enable a kind of m2m communication with IPsec.
This draft describes a scenario to use IKEv2 for a minimum specification.
The document only allows one side to be a responder. I would like to a
little
In case anyone wonders, my reply to Yaron was basically:
I dunno will be interested to find out if you're
missing something or not
S.
On 08/03/11 07:35, Yaron Sheffer wrote:
Hi Glen,
thank you for your kind words. It is always a pleasure to help a fellow
security working group, and your
I also agree that this draft is useful, and I support its going forward, either
as a WG document or as an individual document.
While data communications may originate from either side (sensor notifies
controller, controller queries sensor, controller sends command to actuator), I
think it is
