Hi Paul,
> The idea is that it is Initiator who decides whether to use
> fragmentation or not,
> as only he/she is responsible for retransmissions. Responder is just a
> "slave".
> And for simplicity we assume that either both use fragmentation or both
> don't.
> It is stated in the beginning
On Fri, 4 Oct 2013, Valery Smyslov wrote:
The idea is that it is Initiator who decides whether to use fragmentation or
not,
as only he/she is responsible for retransmissions. Responder is just a
"slave".
And for simplicity we assume that either both use fragmentation or both
don't.
It is state
Hi Yaron,
If Responder receives IKE Fragment Message after it received, successfully
verified and processed regular message with the same Message ID, it means
that response message didn't reach Initiator and it activated IKE
Fragmentation. If Fragment Number in Encrypted Fragment Payload in t
Hi Valery,
thanks for the update. A question about some text that's not new to -03:
Quoting from Sec. 2:
If Responder receives IKE Fragment Message after it received,
successfully verified and processed regular message with the same
Message ID, it means that response message didn't reach Init
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Host Identity Protocol Working Group of the
IETF.
Title : Host Identity Protocol Certificates
Author(s) : Tobias Heer
Samu V
Hi all,
I've just posted new version of IKEv2 Fragmentation draft.
Comparing with -02 version it clarifies Initiator's behaviour
with regard to retransmissions.
Regards,
Valery Smyslov.
- Original Message -
From:
To:
Cc:
Sent: Friday, October 04, 2013 4:35 PM
Subject: [IPsec] I-D
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the IP Security Maintenance and Extensions
Working Group of the IETF.
Title : IKEv2 Fragmentation
Author(s) : Valery Smyslov
Filename: dra
