Hi,
I would like to re-iterate the importance of clarifying the points below as it
is not possible to assess the performances, relevance and interoperability of
draft-sathyanarayan-ipsecme-advpn-03 at this stage - - these are all important
issues to potential users of this techology.
Thank
BTW, we have 3 possibility for inidicating anonymous ID.
1. Don't send ID Payload at all.
2. Send empty ID Payload (say, Type = 0, Len=0).
3. Send special ID Payload (say, Type=KeyId, Value=anonymous)
For me, case 3 looks the worst, I'd rather to avoid special values.
Case 1 looks the best from
Hi Fred,
All of our co-authors are currently busy, as we need to catch up with many
post holidays pending works. We will get back to you soon.
-- Praveen
On 1/17/14 1:56 AM, Frederic Detienne (fdetienn) fdeti...@cisco.com
wrote:
Hi,
I would like to re-iterate the importance of clarifying the
Thanks Praveen!
fred
On 17 Jan 2014, at 18:01, Praveen Sathyanarayan pravee...@juniper.net
wrote:
Hi Fred,
All of our co-authors are currently busy, as we need to catch up with many
post holidays pending works. We will get back to you soon.
-- Praveen
On 1/17/14 1:56 AM,
On Fri, 17 Jan 2014, Valery Smyslov wrote:
I don't think this complicates the state machine that much, as it's
clearly distinct by the auth type none payload. My preference is for #1.
Thank you for sharing your opinion. I still think that empty
ID is preferrable, as IMHO it will add less
