Hi Valery,
Thanks for your comments. I accept both, and we will use them for the
next revision of the draft.
Best,
Yaron
On 02/21/2014 01:28 PM, Valery Smyslov wrote:
Hi Yaron, Yoav,
very interesting approach. Just a pair of quick comments.
1. You suppose to allocate 16-bytes long
Hi Yaron, Yoav,
very interesting approach. Just a pair of quick comments.
1. You suppose to allocate 16-bytes long SPI for probe response
from "reserved" SPI space. The packet looks like UDP-encapsulated
IPsec packet, so it must start from ESP SPI, for which the values
below 256 are res
Hi,
I have some comments regarding the draft.
First, I'm a bit puzzled by intended status of the draft: Standards Track.
>From my understanding this means, that the document defines some protocol,
that needs to be standardized to get interoperability. But the draft defines
no protocol, it just sp