Re: [IPsec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ipsecme-split-dns-04.txt

2018-01-22 Thread Paul Wouters
On Mon, 22 Jan 2018, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote: Subject: [IPsec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ipsecme-split-dns-04.txt A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-ipsecme-split-dns-04 This version addresses the two points raised by Paul

Re: [IPsec] WG Last Call comments on draft-ietf-ipsecme-split-dns

2018-01-22 Thread Tero Kivinen
Paul Wouters writes: > On Mon, 22 Jan 2018, Tero Kivinen wrote: > > [ added i...@ietf.org to get a general discussion on this, as it seems > this is a procedural issue not specific to the WG ] You are trying to follow wrong procedure. There is NO early allocations for expert review registries.

[IPsec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ipsecme-split-dns-04.txt

2018-01-22 Thread internet-drafts
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the IP Security Maintenance and Extensions WG of the IETF. Title : Split DNS Configuration for IKEv2 Authors : Tommy Pauly

Re: [IPsec] [Ext] Re: WG Last Call comments on draft-ietf-ipsecme-split-dns

2018-01-22 Thread Paul Hoffman
On Jan 22, 2018, at 8:45 AM, Paul Wouters wrote: > I'm trying not to define any DNS terms in this document and stay out of > any character/domain/hostname discussion. How about: > > The content of INTERNAL_DNS_DOMAIN and INTERNAL_DNSSEC_TA may be passed > to another

Re: [IPsec] [Ext] Re: WG Last Call comments on draft-ietf-ipsecme-split-dns

2018-01-22 Thread Michelle Cotton
Hi Paul, Expert review requests don’t generally need early assignment because the expert can review a request immediately and codepoints can be assigned. The working group chairs normally send the requests to i...@iana.org for early allocation. See point 5 in section 3.1: 5. If the Area

Re: [IPsec] [Ext] Re: WG Last Call comments on draft-ietf-ipsecme-split-dns

2018-01-22 Thread Paul Wouters
On Sun, 21 Jan 2018, Paul Hoffman wrote: So how about: The content of INTERNAL_DNS_DOMAIN and INTERNAL_DNSSEC_TA may be passed to another (DNS) program for processing. The content MUST be verified to not contain any malicious characters, before it is passed

Re: [IPsec] WG Last Call comments on draft-ietf-ipsecme-split-dns

2018-01-22 Thread Paul Wouters
On Mon, 22 Jan 2018, Tero Kivinen wrote: [ added i...@ietf.org to get a general discussion on this, as it seems this is a procedural issue not specific to the WG ] execsum: I followed RFC 7120 to get an Early Code Point, and there is confusion about the process between me, the chairs and the

Re: [IPsec] WG Last Call comments on draft-ietf-ipsecme-split-dns

2018-01-22 Thread Tero Kivinen
Paul Wouters writes: > On Mon, 22 Jan 2018, Paul Hoffman wrote: > > > Greetings. This document is still listed as in WG Last Call, although I > > haven't seen anything in the archive about that Last Call closing. > > Yeah, the WGLC ended Nov 9. I have pinged the chairs a few times > already,

Re: [IPsec] [Ext] Re: WG Last Call comments on draft-ietf-ipsecme-split-dns

2018-01-22 Thread Waltermire, David A. (Fed)
Paul and Paul, Thanks for the additional review and dialog. I am currently reviewing this document as the shepherd. It would be good to resolve these issues before moving the draft forward. I will watch this thread for a resolution before submitting the shepherd writeup. Thanks, Dave >