Re: [IPsec] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-sprasad-ipsecme-labeled-ipsec-00.txt (fwd)

> -Original Message- > From: Paul Wouters [mailto:p...@nohats.ca] > Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2018 5:53 PM > To: Hu, Jun (Nokia - US/Mountain View) > Cc: ipsec@ietf.org WG ; Sahana Prasad > > Subject: RE: [IPsec] Fwd: New

Re: [IPsec] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-sprasad-ipsecme-labeled-ipsec-00.txt (fwd)

On Tue, 6 Mar 2018, Hu, Jun (Nokia - US/Mountain View) wrote: Some initial questions/comments: 1. security label is defined as opaque data in the draft, but then how would narrowing work in an inter-op way with opaque data? Or should we define the format for some common use cases (like

Re: [IPsec] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-sprasad-ipsecme-labeled-ipsec-00.txt (fwd)

Some initial questions/comments: 1. security label is defined as opaque data in the draft, but then how would narrowing work in an inter-op way with opaque data? Or should we define the format for some common use cases (like security enforcement, QoS ...) , and adding a sub-type in TS_SECLABEL