[IPsec] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-i2nsf-sdn-ipsec-flow-protection-04.txt

2019-03-19 Thread Rafa Marin-Lopez
Dear all: After receiving an extensive review from Paul Wouters, and comments from Linda and Yoav, we have prepared a new version of draft-ietf-i2nsf-sdn-ipsec-flow-protection. In order to accomplish the comments and improve the readability of YANG models, we have defined three parts:

Re: [IPsec] WG adoptation call for draft-smyslov-ipsecme-ikev2-aux-02

2019-03-19 Thread Tobias Guggemos
> > Hi Tobias, > > > Hey all, > > we have implemented the draft and found a few issues. > > Glad to know. We can do an interoperability testing, I guess :-) Would be great :-) > > > Overall, the separation of IKE_INTERMEDIATE and the > > draft-tjhai-ipsecme-hybrid-qske-ikev2-03 is not

Re: [IPsec] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-pwouters-ikev1-ipsec-graveyard-00.txt

2019-03-19 Thread Valery Smyslov
Hi Jun, > The earlier we get rid of IKEv1, the better > Just one comment, regarding "IKEv2 has now seen wide deployment and provides > a full replacement for all > IKEv1 functionality." , I think there is one feature IKEv2 hasn't provided > equivalent yet is group key > management. Of course, I

Re: [IPsec] WG adoptation call for draft-smyslov-ipsecme-ikev2-aux-02

2019-03-19 Thread Valery Smyslov
Hi Tobias, > Hey all, > we have implemented the draft and found a few issues. Glad to know. We can do an interoperability testing, I guess :-) > Overall, the separation of IKE_INTERMEDIATE and the > draft-tjhai-ipsecme-hybrid-qske-ikev2-03 is not clear in some points. > > I personally like the