> -Original Message-
> From: IPsec [mailto:ipsec-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Paul Wouters
> Sent: Wednesday, March 3, 2021 2:56 AM
> To: Tero Kivinen
> Cc: ipsec@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [IPsec] IPsecME agenda for IETF-110
>
> On Tue, 2 Mar 2021, Tero Kivinen wrote:
>
> >> Can we talk
On Tue, 2 Mar 2021, Tero Kivinen wrote:
Can we talk 5 minutes about
draft-kampati-ipsecme-ikev2-sa-ts-payloads-opt as well ?
The IPR issues are resolved, and I think it is a useful document to
implement.
The draft is expired, are the authors going to resurrect it? Are you
going to present
Paul Wouters writes:
> On Tue, 2 Mar 2021, Tero Kivinen wrote:
>
> > - New items
>
> Can we talk 5 minutes about
> draft-kampati-ipsecme-ikev2-sa-ts-payloads-opt as well ?
>
> The IPR issues are resolved, and I think it is a useful document to
> implement.
The draft is expired, are the
On Tue, 2 Mar 2021, Tero Kivinen wrote:
- New items
Can we talk 5 minutes about draft-kampati-ipsecme-ikev2-sa-ts-payloads-opt as
well ?
The IPR issues are resolved, and I think it is a useful document to implement.
Paul
___
IPsec mailing list
Here is the IPsecME Agenda for IETF 110 meeting. Please submit your
slides before the Friday this week.
--
IP Security Maintenance and Extensions (IPsecME) WG.
IETF 110 - Monday March 8th, 2021
Agenda
- Note Well, technical
Valery Smyslov writes:
> so, what is the outcome? Do you think we should add a recommendation
> not to include source IP address in cookie calculation when TCP is in use?
I am not sure. Perhaps just add comment, that when using TCP the outer
IP address of the NAT might change more often than in
