Re: [IPsec] Transport ESP and SCHC

2022-04-19 Thread Benjamin Kaduk
On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 11:09:26PM -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > Has there been any discussion about Transport ESP and SCHC from lpwan? > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lpwan-architecture/ > > In Sec 5, the assumption is the security envelope is above UDP. e.g. > DTLS and QUIC.

[IPsec] Transport ESP and SCHC

2022-04-19 Thread Robert Moskowitz
Has there been any discussion about Transport ESP and SCHC from lpwan? https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lpwan-architecture/ In Sec 5, the assumption is the security envelope is above UDP. e.g. DTLS and QUIC.  No consideration for ESP Transport. RFC 8824 only deals with CoAP and not

Re: [IPsec] [Lwip] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lwig-minimal-esp-10.txt

2022-04-19 Thread Daniel Migault
Hi, Thanks Paul for the comments. Please find my response below: https://github.com/mglt/draft-mglt-lwig-minimal-esp/pull/3 The main question I have is regarding the use of normative language in an informational document. I would liek some guidance from the IESG so I can implement the changes. Y