[IPsec] Paul Wouters' Discuss on draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-multiple-ke-10: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2022-11-28 Thread Paul Wouters via Datatracker
Paul Wouters has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-multiple-ke-10: Discuss When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer

Re: [IPsec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev1-algo-to-historic-08.txt

2022-11-28 Thread Daniel Migault
On Sun, Nov 27, 2022 at 2:03 PM Paul Wouters wrote: > On Wed, 23 Nov 2022, Tero Kivinen wrote: > > > I.e., the main reason being that group 2 was only MUST algorithm > > before, and moving it from MUST to MUST NOT while we do not have any > > oher algorithms as MUST was considered bad. Also the g

[IPsec] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-multiple-ke-10

2022-11-28 Thread Sean Turner via Datatracker
Reviewer: Sean Turner Review result: Has Nits Hi! Thanks for the well written draft. I really liked Appendix B that includes the tried but discarded designs. Issue worth discussing (and it might be a short discussion): Are there any instructions that the DEs needs to make sure that this registry