> On Apr 27, 2023, at 05:48, mohamed.boucad...@orange.com wrote:
>
> [Med] Do53 is widely used but without a reference. I prefer to maintain in
> this section. Thanks.
It’s only in use for the few encrypted DNS related drafts. I wouldn’t say “wide
use”.
I also think using “unencrypted
Zaheduzzaman Sarker has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ipsecme-add-ike-13: Yes
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
directories. This Internet-Draft is a work item of the IP Security Maintenance
and Extensions (IPSECME) WG of the IETF.
Title : Internet Key Exchange Protocol Version 2 (IKEv2)
Configuration for Encrypted DNS
Hi all,
This version implements the changes that were shared in the list to address the
various IESG reviews, especially from Paul, Rob, and Éric.
Zahed, I wonder whether you checked the thread about the rationale why we are
not using an update header. Hope this clarifies your concern.
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
directories. This Internet-Draft is a work item of the IP Security Maintenance
and Extensions (IPSECME) WG of the IETF.
Title : Internet Key Exchange Protocol Version 2 (IKEv2)
Configuration for Encrypted DNS
