Tero Kivinen <kivi...@iki.fi> wrote:
    > I think we should use normal ESP format i.e. have ESP SPI using
    > following format:

I mostly agree.
But:

    > (0-255 bytes) | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | |

It would be nice to be able to put enough padding to make packets at least
1280, ideally 2048 bytes in size.

that would let us diagnose MTU issues better.


-- 
Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide




Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list
IPsec@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec

Reply via email to