Re: [IPsec] WGLC of draft-ietf-ipsecme-multi-sa-performance

2023-11-13 Thread Yoav Nir
> On 13 Nov 2023, at 12:31, Sahana Prasad wrote: > > Hello, > > I've read the draft and support its adoption. To clarify, the draft is already adopted since July 2021. The question now is whether it is ready to proceed to publication. > Specifically, we (at Red Hat) have use cases where

Re: [IPsec] WGLC of draft-ietf-ipsecme-multi-sa-performance

2023-11-13 Thread Daniel Migault
I support the draft to be moved forward. some nits: """ 2. Performance bottlenecks There are a number of practical reasons why most Implementations have ... """ """ As per RFC 7296 """ Should we move section 8 into the appendix instead of removing the section ? I am also interested in the

Re: [IPsec] WGLC of draft-ietf-ipsecme-multi-sa-performance

2023-11-13 Thread Sahana Prasad
Hello, I've read the draft and support its adoption. Specifically, we (at Red Hat) have use cases where customer to data center links see performance penalties for enabling IPsec on these connections. We've been looking at how to fix this and this draft seems to be a solution for our use case.