Hi Valery,
Thank you for the update. Is there any intention to provide an implementation?
Best regards
Steffen
From: Valery Smyslov
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2024 9:51 AM
To: Fries, Steffen (T CST) ; ipsec@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [IPsec] Re: draft-ietf-ipsecme-g-ikev2, public implementation
maintained.
Any hint in that respect is appreciated.
Best regards
Steffen
From: IPsec On Behalf Of Fries, Steffen
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2024 6:09 PM
To: ipsec@ietf.org
Subject: [IPsec] draft-ietf-ipsecme-g-ikev2, public implementation availability
query
Hi Valery, hi Brian,
While looking at
Hi Valery, hi Brian,
While looking at the latest version of draft-ietf-ipsecme-g-ikev2, I was
wondering if a public implementation is available? It would be interesting to
have a look at the implementation to get a better impression regarding the take
over of enhancements done for GDOI into G-I
Best regards
Steffen
> -Original Message-
> From: Valery Smyslov
> Sent: Wednesday, February 7, 2024 9:03 AM
> To: 'Toerless Eckert'
> Cc: Fries, Steffen (T CST) ; ipsec@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: [IPsec] GDOI and G-IKEv2 payloads
>
> Hi Toerless,
>
&
have at least the same
semantic of the payloads.
That already answers my question.
Best regards
Steffen
From: Valery Smyslov
Sent: Monday, February 5, 2024 8:52 AM
To: Fries, Steffen (T CST) ; ipsec@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [IPsec] GDOI and G-IKEv2 payloads
Hi, Steffen,
in general, G-IKEv2 is not
Hi,
I've got a question regarding the relation of G-IKEv2 and GDOI.
I realized that G-IKEv2 will be the successor of GDOI and would have a question
regarding backward compatibility of payloads defined for GDOI. As the
underlying exchanges for the base key management changed from IKE to IKEv2 th
