Re: [IPsec] [Last-Call] Last Call: (Postquantum Preshared Keys for IKEv2) to Proposed Standard

2019-12-13 Thread Paul Wouters
On Wed, 11 Dec 2019, Salz, Rich wrote: A much better title would be "Mixing Preshared Keys in IKEv2 for Postquantum Resistance". That's better. I misunderstood the document as both you and David Mcgrew kindly explained. I withdraw my concerns and hope the title is changed. I am fine

Re: [IPsec] [Last-Call] Last Call: (Postquantum Preshared Keys for IKEv2) to Proposed Standard

2019-12-11 Thread Yoav Nir
Hi, Paul > On 11 Dec 2019, at 20:03, Paul Hoffman wrote: > > On 11 Dec 2019, at 8:23, Salz, Rich wrote: > >> We are seeing a flurry of these kind of “post quantum protection” things. > > This is the only one I have seen that is a method, not a new key exchange > algorithm. It is

Re: [IPsec] [Last-Call] Last Call: (Postquantum Preshared Keys for IKEv2) to Proposed Standard

2019-12-11 Thread Salz, Rich
> A much better title would be "Mixing Preshared Keys in IKEv2 for Postquantum Resistance". That's better. I misunderstood the document as both you and David Mcgrew kindly explained. I withdraw my concerns and hope the title is changed. ___

Re: [IPsec] [Last-Call] Last Call: (Postquantum Preshared Keys for IKEv2) to Proposed Standard

2019-12-11 Thread Paul Hoffman
On 11 Dec 2019, at 8:23, Salz, Rich wrote: We are seeing a flurry of these kind of “post quantum protection” things. This is the only one I have seen that is a method, not a new key exchange algorithm. It is understandable that you could have missed this from the title which misstates the