Hi Tero,
This is correct. When reading Paul's comment I had in mind the text was
about the SN roll over. However, re-reading the full section this is not
the case and the SN roll over mechanism is described later in the section.
I propose to simply remove the current text "Note ... "
Yours,
Paul Wouters writes:
> > The sequence number discussion mentions the issue of packets falling
> > out of the receive window. We talked about an IKE option/notify to
> > signal this and during that discussion it also came to light that this
> > protocol is going to be used
Hi Paul,
Thanks for the response. Please see my responses inline.
Yours,
Daniel
On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 11:47 AM Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Jul 2022, Daniel Migault wrote:
>
> > The limited SPI numbers and rekeying is still not clear to me.
> > We exchanged a few emails but
On Mon, 18 Jul 2022, Daniel Migault wrote:
The limited SPI numbers and rekeying is still not clear to me.
We exchanged a few emails but that did not result in me understanding
this.
I am happy to understand what is unclear. I suppose the text you are referring
to is the
Hi Paul,
Looking at the history, my latest comments were sent on april 25, and
following your email of may 24, I published the version 11 [1] that
reflected the april changes. (This version should have been published
earlier but was stalled into the data tracker.) So considering the latest
On Mon, 18 Jul 2022, Daniel Migault wrote:
My reading of the datatracker is that the document in IESG Evaluation::AD
Followup for 117 days. I do not see any follow-up with the following email from
may 25 with the latest changes and believe all concerns have been addressed. I
am wondering what
Hi all,
My reading of the datatracker is that the document in IESG Evaluation::AD
Followup for 117 days. I do not see any follow-up with the following email
from may 25 with the latest changes and believe all concerns have been
addressed. I am wondering what prevents the document from being sent
Hi Paul,
Please find my response to your comments. The current version of the file
integrates the language changes as well as changes to address the concerns
of this thread:
https://github.com/mglt/draft-mglt-lwig-minimal-esp/commit/d7710c19802bdce4c978d71ad303b739e1406f1e
Yours,
Daniel
On
