Re: [IPsec] AD Review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc8229bis-05

2022-04-27 Thread Tero Kivinen
Valery Smyslov writes: > Traditionally, IPsec specifications contain very few quantitatives > concerning various timings. This is due to the belief that concrete > timeouts don't affect interoperability. Instead, some very generic > recommendations are usually given. See for example Section 2.4 of

Re: [IPsec] AD Review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc8229bis-05

2022-04-27 Thread Valery Smyslov
HI Roman, thank you for the review. Please see comments inline. > Hi! > > I performed a AD review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc8229bis-05. Thanks for > revising RFC8229 with this new > guidance. Comments are below: > > ** The abstract notes that many of the document updates came from deployment

[IPsec] AD Review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc8229bis-05

2022-04-26 Thread Roman Danyliw
Hi! I performed a AD review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc8229bis-05. Thanks for revising RFC8229 with this new guidance. Comments are below: ** The abstract notes that many of the document updates came from deployment experience. I'm hoping to incorporate that feedback on a particular issue.