Re: [IPsec] Issue #57: Clarify D-H transform

2009-05-05 Thread Tero Kivinen
Yaron Sheffer writes: > Hi Tero, > > Sec. 3.3.2 mentions that you negotiate a D-H group for ESP/AH, even though > you only need encryption and integrity transforms for these protocols. I > find it confusing, certainly for newcomers. For clarity, I suggest to add > after the table in Sec. 3.3.3, th

Re: [IPsec] Issue #57: Clarify D-H transform

2009-05-04 Thread Yaron Sheffer
: Tero Kivinen [mailto:kivi...@iki.fi] > Sent: Monday, May 04, 2009 14:54 > To: Yaron Sheffer > Cc: IPsecme WG > Subject: [IPsec] Issue #57: Clarify D-H transform > > Yaron Sheffer writes: > > Yaron: > > > > 3.3.2: there is no explanation here or elsewhere that the

[IPsec] Issue #57: Clarify D-H transform

2009-05-04 Thread Tero Kivinen
Yaron Sheffer writes: > Yaron: > > 3.3.2: there is no explanation here or elsewhere that the D-H transform for > ESP and AH is used for PFS. > > Paul (off list): > > Not done. I don't think it belongs in 3.3.2, and I also don't agree that the > transform is "the D-H transform for ESP and AH is

[IPsec] Issue #57: Clarify D-H transform

2009-05-03 Thread Yaron Sheffer
Yaron: 3.3.2: there is no explanation here or elsewhere that the D-H transform for ESP and AH is used for PFS. Paul (off list): Not done. I don't think it belongs in 3.3.2, and I also don't agree that the transform is "the D-H transform for ESP and AH is used for PFS"; that's an oversimplificat