Re: [IPsec] WG ADoption call for draft-pwouters-ikev1-ipsec-graveyard

2021-03-15 Thread Michael Richardson
Paul Wouters wrote: > On Sat, 13 Mar 2021, Michael Richardson wrote: >> I'd *like* section 3 to enumerate the claims clearer (Maybe just new >> paragraphs). > You mean a textual change? like split out more, or bullet points? Yes. I am imagine an argument between an operational

Re: [IPsec] WG ADoption call for draft-pwouters-ikev1-ipsec-graveyard

2021-03-14 Thread Paul Wouters
On Sat, 13 Mar 2021, Michael Richardson wrote: I'd *like* section 3 to enumerate the claims clearer (Maybe just new paragraphs). You mean a textual change? like split out more, or bullet points? Pretty much each sentence is a claim, and I think that they should point to references. That wil

Re: [IPsec] WG ADoption call for draft-pwouters-ikev1-ipsec-graveyard

2021-03-14 Thread Panwei (William)
Hi, I support adoption of this draft. Regards & Thanks! Wei Pan -Original Message- From: IPsec [mailto:ipsec-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Tero Kivinen Sent: Monday, March 8, 2021 10:22 PM To: ipsec@ietf.org Subject: [IPsec] WG ADoption call for draft-pwouters-ikev1-ipsec-grave

Re: [IPsec] WG ADoption call for draft-pwouters-ikev1-ipsec-graveyard

2021-03-13 Thread Michael Richardson
Tero Kivinen wrote: > This is the start of 2 week WG adoption call for this document ending > 2021-03-22. Please send your reply about whether you support adopting > this document as WG document to this list. I support adoption. I am frustrated with the WG because we've been talking

Re: [IPsec] WG ADoption call for draft-pwouters-ikev1-ipsec-graveyard

2021-03-11 Thread Valery Smyslov
Hi, I support adoption of this document. FWIW, I also support Dan's comments regarding the draft. Regards, Valery. > This is the start of 2 week WG adoption call for this document ending > 2021-03-22. Please send your reply about whether you support adopting > this document as WG document to thi

Re: [IPsec] WG ADoption call for draft-pwouters-ikev1-ipsec-graveyard

2021-03-11 Thread Sean Turner
I support adoption. I will definitely review. Cheers, spt > On Mar 8, 2021, at 09:21, Tero Kivinen wrote: > > This is the start of 2 week WG adoption call for this document ending > 2021-03-22. Please send your reply about whether you support adopting > this document as WG document to this lis

Re: [IPsec] WG ADoption call for draft-pwouters-ikev1-ipsec-graveyard

2021-03-09 Thread Timothy Winters
On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 10:12 AM Paul Wouters wrote: > On Mon, 8 Mar 2021, Tero Kivinen wrote: > > > Subject: [IPsec] WG ADoption call for > draft-pwouters-ikev1-ipsec-graveyard > > > > This is the start of 2 week WG adoption call for this document ending > > 2

Re: [IPsec] WG ADoption call for draft-pwouters-ikev1-ipsec-graveyard

2021-03-08 Thread Paul Wouters
On Mon, 8 Mar 2021, Tero Kivinen wrote: Subject: [IPsec] WG ADoption call for draft-pwouters-ikev1-ipsec-graveyard This is the start of 2 week WG adoption call for this document ending 2021-03-22. Please send your reply about whether you support adopting this document as WG document to this

[IPsec] WG ADoption call for draft-pwouters-ikev1-ipsec-graveyard

2021-03-08 Thread Tero Kivinen
This is the start of 2 week WG adoption call for this document ending 2021-03-22. Please send your reply about whether you support adopting this document as WG document to this list. This work is considered as maintenance of the IPsec, thus is covered by the generic maintenance work. -- kivi...@i