Valery Smyslov writes:
> the 1.5 week period is over and nobody objected the adoption.
> Is there any reason the draft is not WG document yet?
Nope. Done.
I still have the WGLC calls for labeled ikev2 and multiple-ke drafts
in my todo list, but those will take few days, as I want to read the
Hi,
the 1.5 week period is over and nobody objected the adoption.
Is there any reason the draft is not WG document yet?
Regards,
Valery.
> This is the start of 1.5 week WG adoption call for this document,
> ending 2021-02-07 (just before our IPsecME session in IETF 110).
> Please send your
On Wed, 24 Feb 2021, Tero Kivinen wrote:
This is the start of 1.5 week WG adoption call for this document,
ending 2021-02-07 (just before our IPsecME session in IETF 110).
Please send your reply about whether you support adopting this
document as WG document or not.
I am in favour of
Hi,
as co-author I support adoption of this document.
Regards,
Valery.
> This is the start of 1.5 week WG adoption call for this document,
> ending 2021-02-07 (just before our IPsecME session in IETF 110).
> Please send your reply about whether you support adopting this
> document as WG
This is the start of 1.5 week WG adoption call for this document,
ending 2021-02-07 (just before our IPsecME session in IETF 110).
Please send your reply about whether you support adopting this
document as WG document or not.
Our charter has item for:
RFC8229, published in 2017,
