Paul Wouters wrote:
>> On 6/28/21 1:23 AM, Valery Smyslov wrote:
>>> - Is it OK that the intended status is Standards Track? Shouldn't it be
>>> BCP?
> I think because it contains IANA actions, it should be Standards Track.
Agreed.
(It would be funny for it to be Historic, but
On Mon, 28 Jun 2021, Dan Harkins wrote:
On 6/28/21 1:23 AM, Valery Smyslov wrote:
- Is it OK that the intended status is Standards Track? Shouldn't it be
BCP?
I think because it contains IANA actions, it should be Standards Track.
- The draft states that it updates RFC 7296, 8221,
