Re: [IPsec] WGLC on draft-ietf-ipsecme-implicit-iv-04

2018-06-27 Thread Daniel Migault
.@gmail.com] *On Behalf Of *Daniel > Migault > *Sent:* Tuesday, June 26, 2018 9:11 PM > *To:* Valery Smyslov > *Cc:* Waltermire, David A. (Fed); IPsecME WG > *Subject:* Re: [IPsec] WGLC on draft-ietf-ipsecme-implicit-iv-04 > > > > Hi Valery, > > > > Thanks

Re: [IPsec] WGLC on draft-ietf-ipsecme-implicit-iv-04

2018-06-27 Thread Valery Smyslov
, David A. (Fed); IPsecME WG Subject: Re: [IPsec] WGLC on draft-ietf-ipsecme-implicit-iv-04 Hi Valery, Thanks for the feedback. Here are the update I propose. If that is fine for everyone, I will update the current draft and publish a new version. Yours, Daniel On Tue, Jun 26

Re: [IPsec] WGLC on draft-ietf-ipsecme-implicit-iv-04

2018-06-26 Thread Daniel Migault
Hi Valery, Thanks for the feedback. Here are the update I propose. If that is fine for everyone, I will update the current draft and publish a new version. Yours, Daniel On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 9:22 AM, Valery Smyslov wrote: > Hi, > > I reviewed the draft and I believe it is almost ready.

Re: [IPsec] WGLC on draft-ietf-ipsecme-implicit-iv-04

2018-06-26 Thread Valery Smyslov
Hi, I reviewed the draft and I believe it is almost ready. However, I think there still are few issues. 1. The last para of section 4 says: As the IV MUST NOT repeat for one SA when Counter-Mode ciphers are used, Implicit IV as described in this document MUST NOT be used in setups

Re: [IPsec] WGLC on draft-ietf-ipsecme-implicit-iv-04

2018-06-22 Thread Tobias Guggemos
. Juni 2018 18:01 An: IPsecME WG Betreff: Re: [IPsec] WGLC on draft-ietf-ipsecme-implicit-iv-04 Please note, this is a follow-up to the previous WGLC. This is to confirm WG consensus on the draft before sending it forward to the IESG. Thanks, Dave > -Original Message- > From: Walt

Re: [IPsec] WGLC on draft-ietf-ipsecme-implicit-iv-04

2018-06-18 Thread David Schinazi
Hi, I have read and reviewed the last few revisions of the draft and I believe it is ready for publication. I also implemented Implicit IV for ChaCha20-Poly1305 and it was pretty straightforward. Thanks, David Schinazi > On Jun 18, 2018, at 09:17, Daniel Migault wrote: > > as a co-author,

Re: [IPsec] WGLC on draft-ietf-ipsecme-implicit-iv-04

2018-06-18 Thread Daniel Migault
as a co-author, I believe that all comments received so far have been addressed and the resulting document is in good shape for the IESG. Yours, Daniel On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 12:00 PM, Waltermire, David A. (Fed) < david.walterm...@nist.gov> wrote: > Please note, this is a follow-up to the

Re: [IPsec] WGLC on draft-ietf-ipsecme-implicit-iv-04

2018-06-18 Thread Waltermire, David A. (Fed)
Please note, this is a follow-up to the previous WGLC. This is to confirm WG consensus on the draft before sending it forward to the IESG. Thanks, Dave > -Original Message- > From: Waltermire, David A. (Fed) > Sent: Monday, June 18, 2018 9:39 AM > To: IPsecME WG > Subject: WGLC on

[IPsec] WGLC on draft-ietf-ipsecme-implicit-iv-04

2018-06-18 Thread Waltermire, David A. (Fed)
This message starts a working group last call (WGLC) on draft-ietf-ipsecme-implicit-iv-04, which will conclude on June 29, 2018 at UTC 23:59. Please review and provide feedback on the -04 version (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ipsecme-implicit-iv/). Please indicate if you believe