Thanks for the feed back Valery. I am just waiting a bit in order to see if
there is a consensus in
a) not using suites that badly interfere with some extensions
vs
b) mentioning the suites must not be used wit these extensions.
a) is definitively safer, but we may need b) later as well.
Yours,
Hi Daniel,
thank you for addressing that. I have no problems with your text.
There are two nits, however. First: in phrase ”allow the Message ID to be
re-initialized”
I would use some other word instead of “re-initialized”, e.g. “reused”,
or “repeated”. And second: I would change “IANA is
Hi,
This is the text I propose to address Valery comment regarding the IANA
consideration section. Let me know if you have any comment on that.
Yours,
Daniel
8. IANA Considerations
AES-CTR, AES-CCM, AES-GCM and ChaCha20-Poly1305 are likely to
implement the implicit IV described in this
Sorry, I made a typo (see below):
> 2. IANA Considerations
>
> AES-CTR, AES-CCM, AES-GCM and ChaCha20-Poly1305 are likely to
> implement the implicit IV described in this document. This section
> limits assignment of new code points to the recommended suites
> provided
Hi,
> All,
>
> This message starts a Working Group Last Call (WGLC) for
> draft-mglt-ipsecme-implicit-iv-04.
>
> The version to be reviewed can be found here:
> https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-mglt-ipsecme-implicit-iv-04.txt.
>
> Please send your comments, questions, and edit proposals to the
Hi Tero,
Thanks for the review, It should be easy to fix.
Yours,
Daniel
On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 11:30 AM, Tero Kivinen wrote:
> Waltermire, David A. (Fed) writes:
> > This message starts a Working Group Last Call (WGLC) for
> > draft-mglt-ipsecme-implicit-iv-04.
> >
> > The
Waltermire, David A. (Fed) writes:
> This message starts a Working Group Last Call (WGLC) for
> draft-mglt-ipsecme-implicit-iv-04.
>
> The version to be reviewed can be found here:
> https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-mglt-ipsecme-implicit-iv-04.txt.
>
> Please send your comments, questions, and
All,
This message starts a Working Group Last Call (WGLC) for
draft-mglt-ipsecme-implicit-iv-04.
The version to be reviewed can be found here:
https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-mglt-ipsecme-implicit-iv-04.txt.
Please send your comments, questions, and edit proposals to the WG mail list
until