Re: [IPsec] WGLC on draft-mglt-ipsecme-implicit-iv-04

2017-11-12 Thread Daniel Migault
Thanks for the feed back Valery. I am just waiting a bit in order to see if there is a consensus in a) not using suites that badly interfere with some extensions vs b) mentioning the suites must not be used wit these extensions. a) is definitively safer, but we may need b) later as well. Yours,

Re: [IPsec] WGLC on draft-mglt-ipsecme-implicit-iv-04

2017-11-12 Thread Valery Smyslov
Hi Daniel, thank you for addressing that. I have no problems with your text. There are two nits, however. First: in phrase ”allow the Message ID to be re-initialized” I would use some other word instead of “re-initialized”, e.g. “reused”, or “repeated”. And second: I would change “IANA is

Re: [IPsec] WGLC on draft-mglt-ipsecme-implicit-iv-04

2017-11-12 Thread Daniel Migault
Hi, This is the text I propose to address Valery comment regarding the IANA consideration section. Let me know if you have any comment on that. Yours, Daniel 8. IANA Considerations AES-CTR, AES-CCM, AES-GCM and ChaCha20-Poly1305 are likely to implement the implicit IV described in this

Re: [IPsec] WGLC on draft-mglt-ipsecme-implicit-iv-04

2017-10-30 Thread Valery Smyslov
Sorry, I made a typo (see below): > 2. IANA Considerations > > AES-CTR, AES-CCM, AES-GCM and ChaCha20-Poly1305 are likely to > implement the implicit IV described in this document. This section > limits assignment of new code points to the recommended suites > provided

Re: [IPsec] WGLC on draft-mglt-ipsecme-implicit-iv-04

2017-10-30 Thread Valery Smyslov
Hi, > All, > > This message starts a Working Group Last Call (WGLC) for > draft-mglt-ipsecme-implicit-iv-04. > > The version to be reviewed can be found here: > https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-mglt-ipsecme-implicit-iv-04.txt. > > Please send your comments, questions, and edit proposals to the

Re: [IPsec] WGLC on draft-mglt-ipsecme-implicit-iv-04

2017-10-27 Thread Daniel Migault
Hi Tero, Thanks for the review, It should be easy to fix. Yours, Daniel On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 11:30 AM, Tero Kivinen wrote: > Waltermire, David A. (Fed) writes: > > This message starts a Working Group Last Call (WGLC) for > > draft-mglt-ipsecme-implicit-iv-04. > > > > The

[IPsec] WGLC on draft-mglt-ipsecme-implicit-iv-04

2017-10-27 Thread Tero Kivinen
Waltermire, David A. (Fed) writes: > This message starts a Working Group Last Call (WGLC) for > draft-mglt-ipsecme-implicit-iv-04. > > The version to be reviewed can be found here: > https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-mglt-ipsecme-implicit-iv-04.txt. > > Please send your comments, questions, and

[IPsec] WGLC on draft-mglt-ipsecme-implicit-iv-04

2017-10-26 Thread Waltermire, David A. (Fed)
All, This message starts a Working Group Last Call (WGLC) for draft-mglt-ipsecme-implicit-iv-04. The version to be reviewed can be found here: https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-mglt-ipsecme-implicit-iv-04.txt. Please send your comments, questions, and edit proposals to the WG mail list until