mohamed.boucad...@orange.com writes:
> As you can see at https://tinyurl.com/add-ike-latest, the note is
> updated as follows:
>
> Note: [RFC8598] requires INTERNAL_IP6_DNS (or INTERNAL_IP4_DNS)
> attribute to be mandatory present when INTERNAL_DNS_DOMAIN is
> included. This
Hi Tero,
As you can see at https://tinyurl.com/add-ike-latest, the note is updated as
follows:
Note: [RFC8598] requires INTERNAL_IP6_DNS (or INTERNAL_IP4_DNS)
attribute to be mandatory present when INTERNAL_DNS_DOMAIN is
included. This specification relaxes that constraint
Valery Smyslov writes:
> > I mean if initiator proposes:
> >
> >CP(CFG_REQUEST) =
> > INTERNAL_IP6_ADDRESS()
> > ENCDNS_IP6()
> > ENCDNS_DIGEST_INFO(0, (SHA2-256, SHA2-384, SHA2-512))
> > INTERNAL_DNS_DOMAIN()
> >
> > to indicate that it only wants to talk ENCDNS server,
Hi Tero,
> mohamed.boucad...@orange.com writes:
> > > But my understanding is that this is not the case here, as if you
> > > send INTERNAL_DNS_DOMAIN without INTERNAL_IP*_DNS but with
> > > ENCDNS_IP* to implementations supporting old RFC,
> >
> > [Med] Responders know when it will break. They
mohamed.boucad...@orange.com writes:
> > But my understanding is that this is not the case here, as if you
> > send INTERNAL_DNS_DOMAIN without INTERNAL_IP*_DNS but with
> > ENCDNS_IP* to implementations supporting old RFC,
>
> [Med] Responders know when it will break. They will basically supply
Hi Tero,
Please see inline.
Cheers,
Med
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Tero Kivinen
> Envoyé : vendredi 17 mars 2023 14:29
> À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET
> Cc : Patrick Mevzek ;
> dns...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-ipsecme-add-ike@ietf.org;
> ipsec@ietf.org; last-c...@ietf.org
> Objet :
mohamed.boucad...@orange.com writes:
> > At the IETF process level, which I don't master, because of last
> > note in §4, shouldn't that document explicitly say it updates
> > RFC8598?
>
> [Med] We discussed this point at the time (and I was personally for
> adding the header), but we didn't
Hi Patrick,
Thank you for the careful review. Really appreciated.
A candidate version to address your review can be seen at:
https://tinyurl.com/add-ike-latest. Let's us know if any further change is
needed.
Please see inline for more context.
Cheers,
Med
> -Message d'origine-
> De
