On Wed, 6 Nov 2019, Valery Smyslov wrote:
Do you think the current diagrams are confusing?
Yes. Because often I go back to RFCs and only look at the diagrams
expecting it to be what I need to implement. So for optional/required
payloads, I would mostly look at the diagram, and perhaps read a
> -Original Message-
> From: Valery Smyslov
> Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2019 2:50 AM
> To: 'Benjamin Kaduk'
> Cc: draft-ietf-ipsecme-qr-ikev2@ietf.org; ipsec@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: AD review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-qr-ikev2-08
>
> Hi Ben,
>
> please see inline (I removed those
Hi,
So did the adoption poll succeed? :)
Thanks,
Chris.
> On Oct 26, 2019, at 11:17 AM, Tero Kivinen wrote:
>
> So this is fast (one week) adoption call for the
> draft-hopps-ipsecme-iptfs draft to be accepted to the WG document. We
> did have quite positive feedback in last IETF meeting and
