Re: [IPsec] Quantum Resistance Requirements

2016-08-12 Thread Tommy Pauly
Hi Scott, Great list! Responses inline. Best, Tommy > On Aug 11, 2016, at 3:00 PM, Scott Fluhrer (sfluhrer) > wrote: > > In Berlin, we decided to take up Quantum Resistance as a work item, and that > we should start talking about requirements. I’m starting this thread

Re: [IPsec] Quantum Resistance Requirements

2016-08-12 Thread Scott Fluhrer (sfluhrer)
> -Original Message- > From: Michael Richardson [mailto:mcr+i...@sandelman.ca] > Sent: Friday, August 12, 2016 10:13 AM > To: Scott Fluhrer (sfluhrer) > Cc: IPsecme WG (ipsec@ietf.org) > Subject: Re: [IPsec] Quantum Resistance Requirements > > > Scott Fluhrer (sfluhrer)

Re: [IPsec] Quantum Resistance Requirements

2016-08-12 Thread Michael Richardson
Scott Fluhrer (sfluhrer) wrote: > - Simplicity; how large of a change to IKE (and IKE implementations) > are we willing to contemplate? > o My opinion: minimizing changes to IKE should be given high priority, > both because “complexity is the enemy of