Re: [IPsec] Adoption call for draft-hopps-ipsecme-iptfs

2019-10-28 Thread Yoav Nir
I have read the -01 version of this draft. I believe it addresses a useful use case and that the solution presented there is a good starting point. I support its adoption. Yoav > On 26 Oct 2019, at 18:17, Tero Kivinen wrote: > > So this is fast (one week) adoption call for the >

Re: [IPsec] Adoption call for draft-hopps-ipsecme-iptfs

2019-10-28 Thread Tommy Pauly
I've read the document and think this is good problem area to work on, and this document is a good starting place to adopt. Going forward, I would like to see more discussion and review of the use IP fragmentation (how often is that really needed, and is it worth the concerns stated in

Re: [IPsec] Adoption call for draft-hopps-ipsecme-iptfs

2019-10-28 Thread Michael Richardson
I have read the document in a few iterations. I think that it addresses an important need both for resistance to traffic analysis, but also it has the potential to deal with the PMTU problems that tunnels always seem to create. Please adopt! -- Michael Richardson , Sandelman Software Works