Re: [IPsec] Shepherd write up review for draft-ietf-ipsecme-labeled-ipsec

2023-02-09 Thread Paul Wouters
On Thu, 9 Feb 2023, Tero Kivinen wrote: which do not match. I suggest just removing the section 3 text, as this is already explained in the section 2.2. Or perhaps moving the text from section 2.2 to section 3, replacing that old section 3 paragraph with the text moved from section 2.2. I did

[IPsec] Milestones changed for ipsecme WG

2023-02-09 Thread IETF Secretariat
Changed milestone "The security labels support for IKEv2 to IESG", resolved as "Done". URL: https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/ipsecme/about/ ___ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec

[IPsec] Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-ipsecme-labeled-ipsec-09

2023-02-09 Thread Tero Kivinen via Datatracker
Tero Kivinen has requested publication of draft-ietf-ipsecme-labeled-ipsec-09 as Proposed Standard on behalf of the IPSECME working group. Please verify the document's state at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ipsecme-labeled-ipsec/ ___

[IPsec] Shepherd write up review for draft-ietf-ipsecme-labeled-ipsec

2023-02-09 Thread Tero Kivinen
I already send some comments, but now when I am checking the modified draft I found some other nits, that might need to be fixed at some point (I will still put the document forward today, authors can fix those later when they have time, or when they have other comments during the IETF last call