Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ipsecme-qr-ikev2-10: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer
Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
charter-ietf-ipsecme-11-01: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
The document
Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ipsecme-tcp-encaps-10: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please
I didn't propose to obsolete RFC3947 in this document. I guess you can also
file an error for this if you don't want to take any further actions.
However, for updating the IANA registry, I would say the right action is to
do this simply by IESG approval for UDP then.
Mirja
On 03.05.2017 11:1
Hi Tero,
a few quick replies but we also discussed this yesterday at the telechat and
agreed on a way forward.
On 27.04.2017 16:12, Tero Kivinen wrote:
Mirja Kühlewind writes:
I agree that this kind of port squatting is regrettable, but I also don't
think it really
helps to not publish
wrote:
On Apr 27, 2017, at 7:32 AM, Mirja Kühlewind wrote:
See below
On 27.04.2017 16:27, Eric Rescorla wrote:
"This document leaves the selection of TCP ports up to
implementations. It is suggested to use TCP port 4500, which is
allocated for
See below
On 27.04.2017 16:27, Eric Rescorla wrote:
"This document leaves the selection of TCP ports up to
implementations. It is suggested to use TCP port 4500, which is
allocated for IPsec NAT Traversal."
Which sounds to me like an invit
See below.
On 27.04.2017 16:10, Eric Rescorla wrote:
On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 6:42 AM, Mirja Kühlewind mailto:i...@kuehlewind.net>> wrote:
Hi Ekr, hi all,
(not sure anymore which email best to reply to but I'm using this one now
to partly also reply to others).
Yes, just saying...
On 27.04.2017 15:50, Eric Rescorla wrote:
On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 6:46 AM, Mirja Kühlewind mailto:i...@kuehlewind.net>> wrote:
One more side comment on the magic number: actually the magic number
makes it easy for network operator to identify IKE/IPSec traf
, you should
probably always encrypt it.
On 27.04.2017 15:42, Mirja Kühlewind wrote:
Hi Ekr, hi all,
(not sure anymore which email best to reply to but I'm using this one now to
partly also reply to others).
See below.
On 27.04.2017 14:51, Eric Rescorla wrote:
On Thu, Apr 27, 2017
Hi Ekr, hi all,
(not sure anymore which email best to reply to but I'm using this one now to
partly also reply to others).
See below.
On 27.04.2017 14:51, Eric Rescorla wrote:
On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 1:32 AM, Mirja Kühlewind mailto:i...@kuehlewind.net>> wrote:
I do see
Hi Tommy,
please see below, only on the first point for now.
On 26.04.2017 05:28, Tommy Pauly wrote:
On Apr 25, 2017, at 5:48 AM, Mirja Kühlewind wrote:
Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ipsecme-tcp-encaps-09: Discuss
When responding, please keep
Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ipsecme-tcp-encaps-09: Discuss
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to
Hi Valery,
sorry for the late reply (holidays :-) )
See below.
On 25.09.2016 22:20, Valery Smyslov wrote:
Hi Mirja, Yoav,
I agree with Yoav's answers, just want to clarify a few things. See below
(I removed the comments where I have nothing to add to Yoav's answers).
---
14 matches
Mail list logo
