Hi Valery,
okay. Didn’t see that it’s already in the RFC editor queue.
One more comment below but no big issue. So everything you do is fine.
> Am 12.10.2016 um 16:22 schrieb Valery Smyslov :
>
> Hi Mirja,
>
> please see inline. The draft is already in RFC Editor's queue, so please
> see our
Hi Mirja,
please see inline. The draft is already in RFC Editor's queue, so please
see our reasonings for addressing your comments (we add one clarifications
and ignored two other cases, please see why).
Regards,
Valery.
Hi Valery,
sorry for the late reply (holidays :-) )
See below.
On 25.0
Hi Valery,
sorry for the late reply (holidays :-) )
See below.
On 25.09.2016 22:20, Valery Smyslov wrote:
Hi Mirja, Yoav,
I agree with Yoav's answers, just want to clarify a few things. See below
(I removed the comments where I have nothing to add to Yoav's answers).
---
Hi Mirja, Yoav,
I agree with Yoav's answers, just want to clarify a few things. See below
(I removed the comments where I have nothing to add to Yoav's answers).
> --
> COMMENT:
> ---
Hi Yoav,
okay. I guess some of the reasoning you gave could go into the draft…
Thanks!
Mirja
> Am 23.09.2016 um 22:06 schrieb Yoav Nir :
>
> Hi.
>
> See responses below
>
>> On 23 Sep 2016, at 10:11 PM, Mirja Kuehlewind wrote:
>
>> --
Hi.
See responses below
> On 23 Sep 2016, at 10:11 PM, Mirja Kuehlewind wrote:
> --
> COMMENT:
> --
>
> Some questions:
>
> 1) sec 7.1.2: If there is a puzzl
