m>>
*Sent:* Nov 20, 2015 3:11 PM
*To:* Tommy Pauly; IPsecME WG
*Subject:* Re: [IPsec] New revision of TCP Encapsulation draft
Hi Tommy,
I also think this is very relevant work. Here are some comments to -01:
I think that Yoav's draft, draft-nir-ipsecme-ike-tcp-01, should be cited
un
tf.org/internet-drafts/draft-pauly-ipsecme-tcp-encaps-02.txt
Please check it out, and provide feedback.
Thanks.
Samy.
*From:* Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.i...@gmail.com>
*Sent:* Nov 20, 2015 3:11 PM
*To:* Tommy Pauly; IPsecME WG
*Subject:* Re: [IPsec] New revision of TCP Encapsulation dr
ps://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-pauly-ipsecme-tcp-encaps-02.txt>
>>
>> Please check it out, and provide feedback.
>>
>>
>> Thanks.
>> Samy.
>>
>>
>> From: Yaron Sheffer < <mailto:yaronf.i...@gmail.com>yaronf.i...@gmail.co
Hi Tommy,
I also think this is very relevant work. Here are some comments to -01:
I think that Yoav's draft, draft-nir-ipsecme-ike-tcp-01, should be cited
under "prior work", both because it is documented and also because I
believe it is implemented by a vendor.
In Sec. 1, under the UDP
Hi Tommy,
I also think this is very relevant work. Here are some comments to -01:
I think that Yoav's draft, draft-nir-ipsecme-ike-tcp-01, should be cited
under "prior work", both because it is documented and also because I
believe it is implemented by a vendor.
In Sec. 1, under the UDP
> On 21 Nov 2015, at 1:10 AM, Yaron Sheffer wrote:
>
> Hi Tommy,
>
> I also think this is very relevant work. Here are some comments to -01:
>
> I think that Yoav's draft, draft-nir-ipsecme-ike-tcp-01, should be cited
> under "prior work”
That’s