arified.
This should refer to the TLS NULL cipher, not ESP.
>
> 8. The draft is silent about ESP Sequence Numbers. I think a few words could
> be added that while the ESP SN are unnecessary with TCP encapsulation,
> the sender still must increnet it in every sent pack
place.
Thanks.
Samy.
From: IPsec <ipsec-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of Valery Smyslov
<sva...@gmail.com>
Date: Wednesday, March 23, 2016 at 5:03 AM
To: Tommy Pauly <tpa...@apple.com>, "ipsec@ietf.org" <ipsec@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] New version of IK
Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2016 12:52 AM
Subject: [IPsec] New version of IKEv2 TCP Encapsulation draft
Hello all,
I’ve just posted a new version of the IKEv2 and IPSec TCP Encapsulation
draft. The changes include:
- Making the use case (as a last resort if UDP is blocked) more clear
Hello all,
I’ve just posted a new version of the IKEv2 and IPSec TCP Encapsulation draft.
The changes include:
- Making the use case (as a last resort if UDP is blocked) more clear in the
introduction
- Clarify connection establishment and teardown section (allowing a resumed
connection to
