Re: [IPsec] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on charter-ietf-ipsecme-10-00: (with COMMENT)

2016-08-31 Thread Tommy Pauly
> On Aug 31, 2016, at 3:23 AM, Tero Kivinen wrote: > > Kathleen Moriarty writes: "There have been middle boxes blocking IKE negotiation over UDP. To make IKE work in these environments, IKE packets need to be encapsulated in a TCP tunnel. >>> >>> >>> "In a TCP

Re: [IPsec] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on charter-ietf-ipsecme-10-00: (with COMMENT)

2016-08-31 Thread Tero Kivinen
Kathleen Moriarty writes: > >> "There have been middle boxes blocking IKE negotiation over UDP. To > >> make IKE work in these environments, IKE packets need to be > >> encapsulated in a TCP tunnel. > > > > > > "In a TCP tunnel" is perhaps a little confusing, as IPinIP or an IPsec > > tunnel was

Re: [IPsec] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on charter-ietf-ipsecme-10-00: (with COMMENT)

2016-08-30 Thread Kathleen Moriarty
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 11:28 PM, Paul Wouters wrote: > On Mon, 29 Aug 2016, Spencer Dawkins wrote: > >> -- >> COMMENT: >> -- >> >> This sentence

Re: [IPsec] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on charter-ietf-ipsecme-10-00: (with COMMENT)

2016-08-29 Thread Paul Wouters
On Mon, 29 Aug 2016, Spencer Dawkins wrote: -- COMMENT: -- This sentence doesn't parse for me - or maybe I just need more security clue? "IKEv1 using shared

[IPsec] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on charter-ietf-ipsecme-10-00: (with COMMENT)

2016-08-29 Thread Spencer Dawkins
Spencer Dawkins has entered the following ballot position for charter-ietf-ipsecme-10-00: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) The document,