On Mon, 12 Feb 2018, Valery Smyslov wrote:
This is one particular implementation peculiarity, there
will be others that behaves oddly. The point is, if we introduce a new
Transform Type, it is very likely that backward compatibility can no
longer be achieved.
Again, it depends. If the
Hi,
thank you for the explanation. See my comments inline.
> 1. Negotiation
>
> We are glad to see that you also appreciate the need to negotiate a
> hybrid group. As you may remember, we introduced a new Transform Type
> in our version 00 of our draft and it had not been well-received in
>
