On Mon, 19 Nov 2018, Linda Dunbar wrote:
When you said “IPs are sourced loopbacks that are part of a prefix exported to
the the isp(s) in each site”,
do you mean that the private Loopback addresses of CPE1 & CPE2 are routable in
all four ISPs’ that
connected to A1, A2, B1, B2?
And to
Adam Roach has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ipsecme-split-dns-14: Yes
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to
Hi Paul:
First of all, thank you very much for this impressive review. We are going to
process all your comments as soon as possible by separating our answers in
different e-mails so that the discussion is easier to follow.
In any case, we would like to answer first to your initial question
Hi Paul,
On Mon, Nov 19, 2018, at 4:50 AM, Paul Wouters wrote:
> On 2018-11-18 12:40 a.m., Alexey Melnikov wrote:
> > --
> > DISCUSS:
> > --
> >
> > This is a
IPsec experts,
In the following diagram, CPE1 has two internet ports, A1 by one service
provider, A2 by another service provider.
CPE2 also have two ports facing two different internet service providers
Question: can I establish ONE IPsec SA between CPE1 & CPE2? (i.e. between
10.1.1.1 &
Christer, thank you for your review. Tommy, thank you for addressing Christer’s
comments. I entered a No Objection ballot.
Alissa
> On Oct 22, 2018, at 4:26 PM, Tommy Pauly wrote:
>
> Hi Christer,
>
> Thanks again for the review. I've addressed all three comments below in an
> update to
Joel,
Thanks for the help.
When you said “IPs are sourced loopbacks that are part of a prefix exported to
the the isp(s) in each site”, do you mean that the private Loopback addresses
of CPE1 & CPE2 are routable in all four ISPs’ that connected to A1, A2, B1, B2?
Linda
From: joel jaeggli
