Hi All,
I think this is not a solution. The problems of routing header type 0 well
know by the community since long time. This has been documented for more
than 2-3 years know (raised 4 years ago). Are there any consensus, that
type 0 routing header should be deprecated? Until that it is
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 09:41:09AM +0200, Mohacsi Janos wrote:
I think this is not a solution. The problems of routing header type 0 well
know by the community since long time. This has been documented for more
than 2-3 years know (raised 4 years ago). Are there any consensus, that
type 0
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 10:24:08 +0200, Gert Doering [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, one could argue that the standard isn't very well-written then - a
machine that is a *host* should NEVER forward packets, period.
That's a BSD bug, not a standard bug.
The IPv6 specification says host must process
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 10:24:08 +0200, Gert Doering [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, one could argue that the standard isn't very well-written then - a
machine that is a *host* should NEVER forward packets, period.
bzzzt. with IPv6 spec NODE (host + router) has to handle routing
... The problems of routing header type 0 well know by the community since
long time. This has been documented for more than 2-3 years know (raised 4
years ago). Are there any consensus, that type 0 routing header should be
deprecated? ...
yes. nobody anywhere still thinks that this is
... The problems of routing header type 0 well know by the community since
long time. This has been documented for more than 2-3 years know (raised 4
years ago). Are there any consensus, that type 0 routing header should be
deprecated? ...
yes. nobody anywhere still thinks that this is
At Wed, 25 Apr 2007 09:41:09 +0200 (CEST), Mohacsi Janos wrote:
The current patch provided by OpenBSD/FreeBSD makes *BSD IPv6
implemenation non-conformant to standard.
Sometimes violating the standard is the only reasonable thing for an
implementor to do. The (IPv4) stack I worked on back in
Yes, absolutely. Rob, I couldn't agree more.
From: Rob Austein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/04/25 Wed AM 09:13:36 CDT
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], ipv6@ietf.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: IPv6 Type 0 Routing Header issues
At Wed, 25 Apr 2007 09:41:09 +0200 (CEST), Mohacsi Janos wrote:
The
[trimming this to just the IPv6 w.g.]
We think the question for the IPv6 working group on this topic is
does the working group want to do anything to address the issues
raised about the Type 0 routing header. Possible actions include:
1) Deprecate all usage of RH0
2) Recommend that RH0
Bob Hinden wrote:
[trimming this to just the IPv6 w.g.]
We think the question for the IPv6 working group on this topic is does
the working group want to do anything to address the issues raised about
the Type 0 routing header. Possible actions include:
1) Deprecate all usage of RH0
2)
10 matches
Mail list logo