On 8/22/2014 7:32 AM, Lorenzo Colitti wrote:
Note that from the text it sounds like SPF / DKIM is not strictly
required, but it looks like a PTR record is a hard requirement.
PTRs are a hard requirement, yes. That's not a problem. All places
where you can run a legitimate MX will have
On 2014-11-02 09:53, Darren Pilgrim wrote:
On 8/22/2014 7:32 AM, Lorenzo Colitti wrote:
Note that from the text it sounds like SPF / DKIM is not strictly
required, but it looks like a PTR record is a hard requirement.
PTRs are a hard requirement, yes. That's not a problem. All places
where
On Nov 02, Darren Pilgrim dar...@bluerosetech.com wrote:
The problem is Google ignores the fact you must not hard fail on DNS. Even
if the response is NXDOMAIN, the most you can do is soft bounce because you
can not know why you didn't get an RR. Gmail hard bounces on such errors
No, not
On 11/02/2014 06:55 PM, Darren Pilgrim wrote:
On 8/22/2014 2:46 AM, Matija Grabnar wrote:
So, much as I would LIKE to have reverse IPv6 DNS on my mail servers, in
some cases it is just not possible.
Can you describe those cases? I can't think of any scenarios where
you'd run a
If the provider won't or is unable to provide reverse for the IPv6
static address you have, it will be sub-optimal for you to continue to
advertise and/or use the IPv6 address for SMTP.
It's all part of the 'prove it's not a dynamic ip address' and part of
the 'proper reverse DNS provides
[As a side note, it seems that the European 'google' statistics are now more in
line with the expectation]
Several countries have recently made good progress dixit Google Apnic (URL
are simply a different way of presenting Google data):
* US has reached 10%, welcome to the 10%-club
*
