Re: IPv6 plan for multisite corporate

2018-05-21 Thread Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
Several US companies (including my employes) simply use the same ARIN prefix everywhere and inject local routes at each WW locations. As long as the prefix length is short enough, there will be no issue about routing or about RIR. -éric On 21/05/18 06:47,

Re: IPv6 plan for multisite corporate

2018-05-21 Thread Luigi Rosa
Erik Kline wrote on 21/05/2018 08:13: Please don't do NAT. You're just moving a ton of pain onto application developers. I would very much like to avoid NAT, what I am looking for is a technology or feature that allows me to avoid NAT. Also because the developers share their pain withh the

Re: IPv6 plan for multisite corporate

2018-05-21 Thread Erik Kline
On Mon, 21 May 2018 at 14:59, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote: > On Mon, 21 May 2018, Luigi Rosa wrote: > > Hi, > > one of my customer is a US corporate with offices literally on 5 continents > > and one datacentre. Offices are connected each other and to the datacentrevia > > MPLS,

Re: IPv6 plan for multisite corporate

2018-05-21 Thread Luigi Rosa
Mikael Abrahamsson wrote on 21/05/2018 07:59: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-enterprise-pa-multihoming-06 might be relevant to your requirements. This is a great starting point, thank you! For sure I will do 1:1 NAT if I will have do go with NPTv6. -- Ciao, luigi /

Re: IPv6 plan for multisite corporate

2018-05-21 Thread Mikael Abrahamsson
On Mon, 21 May 2018, Luigi Rosa wrote: Hi, one of my customer is a US corporate with offices literally on 5 continents and one datacentre. Offices are connected each other and to the datacentrevia MPLS, each office accesses the Internet via local ISP. Since they asked me to start planning