USG DOT IPv6 network issues

In case anyone has a contact at USA DOT FRA, their website is failing on IPv6 wget -6 https://www.fra.dot.gov/Page/P0001 converted 'https://www.fra.dot.gov/Page/P0001' (ANSI_X3.4-1968) -> ' https://www.fra.dot.gov/Page/P0001' (UTF-8) --2017-01-23 13:06:40--

Bad aaaa from www.rt.com

Anyone have a contact at www.rt.com that can encourage them to to delete their bad ? This is breaking nat64 users who see a so no dns64 is being done. Shared from ISC Dig for iOS ; <<>> DiG 9.10.4 <<>> @fe80::4c60:deff:fee6:b019 @192.168.1.1 www.rt.com +sit +dnssec +noqr

Re: IPv6-misconfigurations

On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 6:57 AM, Thomas Schäfer wrote: > Hi, > > I am observing sometimes very strange ipv6-misconfigurations. > > The last two examples are: > > > www.hs-worms.de > > LANG=C wget -6 www.hs-worms.de > converted 'http://www.hs-worms.de' (ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Re: Google no longer returning AAAA records?

On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 11:24 PM, Lorenzo Colitti lore...@google.com wrote: And in the meantime, accept that the users of that operator's network cannot reliably reach our services? If you were a user of that operator, I suspect you wouldn't like that. I suspect you especially wouldn't like

Re: Why do we still need IPv4 when we are migrating to IPv6...

On Wednesday, February 11, 2015, Anfinsen, Ragnar ragnar.anfin...@altibox.no wrote: Hi guys. I am working with my management team to implement IPv6, but I got an interesting question from one of the managers; Why do we need more IPv4 if we are moving towards IPv6? A quick background; We

6to4 in Internet aaaa records

Folks, What is the general impression of 6to4 addresses in records? I recently had a customer complain about this situation, and i am not sure, as a service provider, how to deal with it. From my home comcast connection with real full dual-stack, i get this cbyrne@ ~ $ wget -6

Re: 6to4 in Internet aaaa records

On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 7:47 PM, Jeroen Massar jer...@massar.ch wrote: On 2014-10-02 22:37, Ca By wrote: [..] Yes, i think .gov requires records. So it looks like DNS admins are generating records that ultimately break connectivity. Back to my question, should there be an RFC