On Mon, 21 May 2018 at 14:59, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
> On Mon, 21 May 2018, Luigi Rosa wrote:
> > Hi,
> > one of my customer is a US corporate with offices literally on 5
continents
> > and one datacentre. Offices are connected each other and to the
datacentrevia
> > MPLS,
All true.
I forgot to say that we've seen (years ago) routers than announced
2001:db8::/something, and if this were doing such a thing that could
lead to this situation.
On 9 May 2016 at 18:17, Tore Anderson <t...@fud.no> wrote:
> * Erik Kline <e...@google.com>
>
>> If
A bug report, especially from a Marshmallow (or even N Developer
Preview) device could be helpful.
What does rdisc6 show on these networks (before IPv6 is disabled)?
issue at one point. We had issues with DNS over IPv6.
> Bad DNS and/or network configurations. Once these were fixed, the problems
> cleared up.
>
> On Sunday, April 24, 2016, Erik Kline <e...@google.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 24 April 2016 at 19:53, Jeroen Massar <jer...@m
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 7:41 PM, Phil Mayers p.may...@imperial.ac.uk wrote:
On 16/04/15 01:57, Lorenzo Colitti wrote:
For the avoidance of mystery: Google performs measurements of IPv6
connectivity and latency on an ongoing basis. The Google DNS servers do
not return records to DNS
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 12:28 PM, Brian E Carpenter
brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com wrote:
On 17/04/2015 15:17, Erik Kline wrote:
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 7:41 PM, Phil Mayers p.may...@imperial.ac.uk wrote:
On 16/04/15 01:57, Lorenzo Colitti wrote:
For the avoidance of mystery: Google performs
Appreciate your feedback, but as long as the majority of Norwegian content
providers does not move on IPv6, including governmental sites, and the
potential risk of the Norwegian government implementing some sort of Data
Retention Directive, it makes sense to by addresses instead of doing
There in lies the problem. I have received escalations in the last few
days on my eyeball network regarding internet servers with 6to4 in DNS and
NAT64 WKP in DNS. In the WKP case, the server operator read the RFCs and
tried to pursued me to his understanding of those RFCs that i should
My thinking immediately went to DS-lite, NAT64/DNS64 and MAP-E, but I
NAT64/DNS64 isn't good enough without 464XLAT, and DS-lite and MAP-E
requires additional software on most of these operating systems, right? Are
these kinds of client software even available?
Is NAT64/DNS64 without 464xlat