On 05/26/16 00:33, Ignatios Souvatzis wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 08:30:50AM +0200, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've run into a scenario where a website doesn't seem to be listening to
>> PTB. I can reach them just fine from an MTU1500 clean IPv6 connection, but
>> if I reach
The path MTU is available to applications. It seems like a bug in
QUIC or Chrome to not send smaller packets when it can know the packets
will be fragmented. Or just use TCP.
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 11:55:57AM +0900, Lorenzo Colitti wrote:
Thanks for reporting this. What was the effect?
No, the minimum MTU is a requirement on links, not hosts. Hosts are
always allowed to send smaller packets than the MTU if they want
to. Also, the MSS includes TCP options, so it might be 1208 on a
1280-byte link.
There are conflicting RFCs, but the consensus seems to be the MSS is
computed
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 12:56:06PM +0100, Jeroen Massar wrote:
On 2014-11-11 06:38, Matthew Luckie wrote:
Also, broken pMTU/traceroute for:
2a02:58:3:110::23:1
2a01:310:8312:1001::19
2a00:1f00:dc06:11::10
2001:48c8:3:2::2
2607:fcc0:2:1:208:70:247:50
2001:67c:2274:4021::101
Also, broken pMTU/traceroute for:
2a02:58:3:110::23:1
2a01:310:8312:1001::19
2a00:1f00:dc06:11::10
2001:48c8:3:2::2
2607:fcc0:2:1:208:70:247:50
2001:67c:2274:4021::101
I took a look at the tracepath information you sent for these nodes,
which showed a bunch of unresponsive nodes but no
