Re: Why used DHCPv6 when RA has RDNSS and DNSSL?

2020-04-02 Thread Philip Homburg
>> Independent of the prefix distribution mechanism, it may be worth revisit= >ing >> having a single /48 for an organisation of 4 employees. > >Sure, but if we start handing out /40s like there's enough of them, >eventually there won't be. I find it weird that the IEEE manages to allocate a

Re: Why used DHCPv6 when RA has RDNSS and DNSSL?

2020-04-02 Thread Philip Homburg
>So you need to somehow build a prefix distribution mechanism, so people >can have an arbitrary number of PD prefixes in "wherever network they=20 >happen to be". So we're back to multi-level PD, with all the challenges >(firewall rules, ACLs, internal routing, ...). And even then, a /48 >might

Re: Why used DHCPv6 when RA has RDNSS and DNSSL?

2020-04-01 Thread Philip Homburg
>We are already 90% of the way here: Make IA_PD work for hosts, not >just for routers. That way Android handsets can have as many addresses >as they want. IA_PD 'works' (for small values of works) for hosts today. The upstream interface of a CPE is defined as a host instead of a router. The big

Re: Atlas probes and 6to4 [Re: IPv6 ingress filtering]

2019-05-20 Thread Philip Homburg
>I tried to traceroute one of them (Probe #3009) at >2002:568:1047:1:220:4aff:fee0:20ac >and it petered out at 6to4.tyo1.he.net [2001:470:0:17a::2] > >The embedded IPv4 address is 5.104.16.71, which is reachable, >and is indeed the published address of probe #3009, so it does >indeed look like a

Re: juniper weird IPv6 error ICMPs

2016-11-09 Thread Philip Homburg
>> And I'm really curious how to got sizes like 989, 990, 993 >> >> > >Did you check the actual contents of the packets? The contents of the packets look fine. The packets I'm sending contain a bit of data and then zeros. The error ICMPs I get back contain the same data and zeros. That aspect

juniper weird IPv6 error ICMPs

2016-11-08 Thread Philip Homburg
Playing with traceroute I noticed that juniper routers send error ICMPs with weird sizes. Did anyone else notice this as well, I can't remember seeing it mentioned anywhere. Here is some tcpdump output: 11:51:14.691810 IP6 2001:67c:2e8:13:21c:42ff:fe9f:b8b3 > ff02::1:ff00:1: ICMP6, neighbor

Re: Netflix hates IPv6

2016-06-15 Thread Philip Homburg
In your letter dated Wed, 15 Jun 2016 11:12:19 +0200 you wrote: >The interesting question is why they hand out v6 addresses in the first >place - I'd assume that Netflix is doing the same global DNS content >steering thing as all the other big content networks, so they should know >where the user