IPv6-related (?) Bind issue

2014-03-06 Thread Yannis Nikolopoulos
Hello all, we've encountered a weird problem on our dual-stack (anycast) resolvers and I'm wondering if anyone else has experienced anything similar. Basically, we're getting many SERVFAIL responses for domains not in cache. The weird part: if the domain does not exist in the cache, a

Re: IPv6-related (?) Bind issue

2014-03-06 Thread Jeroen Massar
On 2014-03-06 10:00 , Yannis Nikolopoulos wrote: [..] https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/2014-March/092706.html https://lists.dns-oarc.net/pipermail/dns-operations/2014-March/011385.html And asking on yet-another list, did you do the /64 change:

Re: IPv6-related (?) Bind issue

2014-03-06 Thread Hannes Frederic Sowa
On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 10:28:22AM +0100, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote: On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 11:00:28AM +0200, Yannis Nikolopoulos wrote: we've encountered a weird problem on our dual-stack (anycast) resolvers and I'm wondering if anyone else has experienced anything similar. Basically,

Re: IPv6-related (?) Bind issue

2014-03-06 Thread Jeroen Massar
On 2014-03-06 10:53 , Yannis Nikolopoulos wrote: On 03/06/2014 11:07 AM, Jeroen Massar wrote: On 2014-03-06 10:00 , Yannis Nikolopoulos wrote: [..] https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/2014-March/092706.html https://lists.dns-oarc.net/pipermail/dns-operations/2014-March/011385.html