...@gmail.commailto:maillist...@gmail.com
Date: mercredi 18 juin 2014 05:28
To: ipv6-ops@lists.cluenet.demailto:ipv6-ops@lists.cluenet.de
ipv6-ops@lists.cluenet.demailto:ipv6-ops@lists.cluenet.de
Subject: IPv6 Assignment for Server
Dear IPv6-Ops,
I want the suggestion about the best practice for assign IPv6 Global
Kittiratanachai maillist...@gmail.com
Date: mercredi 18 juin 2014 05:28
To: ipv6-ops@lists.cluenet.de ipv6-ops@lists.cluenet.de
Subject: IPv6 Assignment for Server
Dear IPv6-Ops,
I want the suggestion about the best practice for assign IPv6 Global
Unicast address for server.
According to the IPv6
@lists.cluenet.demailto:ipv6-ops@lists.cluenet.de
Subject: Re: IPv6 Assignment for Server
Thank you, I forgot to think about NS and NA.
One more question, If I got the /64 mask from ISP and implement as below.
Theoretically, is it work?
Normal Situation: work fine
IPv6 Internet - ISP (2001:db8:a:1::1
(rightfully) complain. But you have decent chance
that it works
-éric
From: Teerapatr Kittiratanachai maillist...@gmail.com
Date: mercredi 18 juin 2014 08:30
To: Eric Vyncke evyn...@cisco.com
Cc: ipv6-ops@lists.cluenet.de ipv6-ops@lists.cluenet.de
Subject: Re: IPv6 Assignment for Server
Thank
Dear Eric,
Great idea, thanks.
Dear Sander,
This is TB is just a government organization which was established to
study/develop in field of technology.
And TB is one of some services that still be in implement phase.
--Te
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 2:15 PM, Sander Steffann san...@steffann.nl
Hi,
This is TB is just a government organization which was established to
study/develop in field of technology.
And TB is one of some services that still be in implement phase.
Ah, so there is still time to fix things :) One of the great things of IPv6 is
that addresses are plentiful.
Eric Vyncke (evyncke) evyn...@cisco.com writes:
If you have one server per LAN, then it is perfectly OK to use one /
64 per server. If you think about that, currently you use a /32 for
IPv4 address :-) You are currently wasting more space (4 billion
times more)
I think that depends on what
On Wednesday, June 18, 2014 09:46:14 AM Jens Link wrote:
It's always good to have more than one IP per server,
this way you run multiple Servers per IP (e.g. DNS or
HTTP). This might get a little dirty but sometimes it
necessary. For internal Server I would go with a /64 or
maybe a /112.
Hi Eric and list,
I wonder why you would like to do that rather than asking for a /60 at
your ISP though :-)
unfortunately there are ISPs and hosters who simply don't get it.
In some cases they haven't yet managed to get this idea out of their
minds that IP addresses are a scarce resource
On 18 Jun 2014, at 10:49, Teerapatr Kittiratanachai maillist...@gmail.com
wrote:
Dear Jens and Mark,
Is there any benefit to assign /112 mask ?
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6man-why64-01
tim
--Te
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Mark Tinka mark.ti...@seacom.mu wrote:
On
10 matches
Mail list logo
