Re: SV: SV: SV: CPE Residential IPv6 Security Poll

2016-10-01 Thread Daniel Roesen
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 01:50:07PM +0200, e.vanu...@avm.de wrote: > CU at BBWF ;-) We are building CPE with IPv6 on board. Which still can't even do static IPv6 routes or open firewall for adresses in prefixes not directly connected. Example: getting a /48 from upstream, either statically

Re: SV: SV: SV: CPE Residential IPv6 Security Poll

2016-09-29 Thread Holger Zuleger
On 29.09.2016 14:28, Thomas Schäfer wrote: > Am 29.09.2016 um 13:50 schrieb e.vanu...@avm.de: >> CU at BBWF ;-) We are building CPE with IPv6 on board. >> >> https://tmt.knect365.com/bbwf/sponsors/avm >> >> Eric > > Without IPv6-support for vpn, without configurable firewall for > dhcpv6-pd,

Re: SV: SV: SV: CPE Residential IPv6 Security Poll

2016-09-29 Thread Thomas Schäfer
Am 29.09.2016 um 13:50 schrieb e.vanu...@avm.de: CU at BBWF ;-) We are building CPE with IPv6 on board. https://tmt.knect365.com/bbwf/sponsors/avm Eric Without IPv6-support for vpn, without configurable firewall for dhcpv6-pd, without the ability to disable IPv4-myfritz-DNS-entries. Some

Re: SV: SV: SV: CPE Residential IPv6 Security Poll

2016-09-29 Thread e . vanuden
CU at BBWF ;-) We are building CPE with IPv6 on board. https://tmt.knect365.com/bbwf/sponsors/avm Eric Von: An: Kopie: ipv6-ops@lists.cluenet.de Datum: 29-09-2016 11:27 Betreff:SV: SV: SV: CPE Residential IPv6