Hi,
If an enterprise today would decide that they're going to run IPv6 only on
their LAN, they would have recent Win7|Win8|OSX|Ubuntu clients on their
client computers, what mechanism would they use to access IPv4 Internet?
My thinking immediately went to DS-lite, NAT64/DNS64 and MAP-E, but
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson swm...@swm.pp.sewrote:
If an enterprise today would decide that they're going to run IPv6 only on
their LAN, they would have recent Win7|Win8|OSX|Ubuntu clients on their
client computers, what mechanism would they use to access IPv4 Internet?
My thinking immediately went to DS-lite, NAT64/DNS64 and MAP-E, but I
NAT64/DNS64 isn't good enough without 464XLAT, and DS-lite and MAP-E
requires additional software on most of these operating systems, right? Are
these kinds of client software even available?
Is NAT64/DNS64 without 464xlat
Am 30.04.2013 09:28, schrieb Валерий Солдатов:
Hello,
I wrote a little script-autoresponder, it helps to check delivery of email via
IPv6.
Simply send an email to t...@mail.v6net.ru.
If we get it via IPv6, you will receive a confirmation letter with
congratulations.
If we get it via IPv4, you
Yes, e...@blazing.de works!
I sent an email from dual-stack smtp-server, and receive an answer letter via
IPv6
Солдатов Валерий, ЗАО Бэст Телеком.
- Исходное сообщение -
От: Tom Spier tsp...@blazing.de
Кому: ipv6-ops@lists.cluenet.de
Отправленные:
On 4/30/2013 12:03 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
Hi,
If an enterprise today would decide that they're going to run IPv6 only
on their LAN,
They wouldn't.
This is a self-defeating question. In other words, if you seriously
contemplated doing this you would know whether you could do it or
Am 30.04.2013 11:25, schrieb Валерий Солдатов:
Hi Thomas,
Records in a maillog show that an answer via IPv6 has been send to
you, hope you receive it. Sorry if you did not receive.
This account works.
But I tried also my private account at t-online.de
With IPv4 you will get an answer
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 03:20:58AM -0700, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
We aren't talking some opt-in mailing list that could possibly
argue that they had a reason to allow a reply to a 3rd party.
There is no reason that a proper autoresponder setup for the purpose
of testing (that the OP stated)
Hi,
given that Christopher Palmer is on this list, I doubt NANOG ml would
be more helpful. CC'ing him for attention. :-)
Best regards,
Daniel
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 11:28:41AM +0100, Nick Hilliard wrote:
On 30/04/2013 11:24, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
- Someone advertises records that
