Re: So, time for some real action?

2014-02-17 Thread emilio brambilla
hello, On 02/06/2014 05:00 PM, Lorenzo Colitti wrote: Ah, right - because it would infuriate people. Just like turning off IPv4 would infuriate 98+% of Internet users. no, we will not shutdown ipv4 on the access network, nor on the servers and neither on the corporate firewalls. ipv4 will

Re: Poll on SMTP over IPv6 Usage

2014-02-17 Thread S.P.Zeidler
Thus wrote emilio brambilla (emi...@ngi.it): PS it's very odd to see so much sendmail on this list, where I would bet to see something more cutting-edge even on the software side! for infrastructure, you run bleeding edge for two reasons: a) you have no choice, it's the only thing that will

Re: Poll on SMTP over IPv6 Usage

2014-02-17 Thread Nick Hilliard
On 17/02/2014 15:16, Ignatios Souvatzis wrote: Not necessarily. All I'd imagine to do with UUCP can be done with postfix and maybe transport tables; I've run a connection that way for a couple of years. This is rapidly turning into a contest of who's admitting to the greatest MTA horrors.

Re: Poll on SMTP over IPv6 Usage

2014-02-17 Thread Ignatios Souvatzis
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 03:37:28PM +, Nick Hilliard wrote: On 17/02/2014 15:16, Ignatios Souvatzis wrote: Not necessarily. All I'd imagine to do with I should maybe have added: e-mail over UUCP can be done with postfix and maybe transport tables; I've run a connection that way for a