MX records, but then
withdrew them, but not before there were a few failures.
Frank
--
Dick Visser
Sr. System Networking Engineer
GÉANT Association, Amsterdam Office (formerly TERENA)
Singel 468D, 1017 AW Amsterdam, the Netherlands
Tel: +31 (0) 20 530 4488
GÉANT Association
Networking
On 13 February 2014 21:23, James Small jim.sm...@mail.com wrote:
Interested in what you’re using to send/receive SMTP over IPv6:
A) Using Postfix on Ubuntu, for mailing lists
B) Using Google Apps for Education for MX/SMTP
--
Dick Visser
System Networking Engineer
TERENA Secretariat
over things.
If you block IPv4 access at the service level (filtering/ACLs), then it's
easier to restore things.
Maybe some intermediate solution, such as serving up an explanation page to
IPv4 users?
Other ideas?
--
Dick Visser
System Networking Engineer
TERENA Secretariat
Singel 468 D, 1017 AW
/02/2014 14:51, Dick Visser wrote:
http://www.internetsociety.org/deploy360/blog/2013/12/campaign-turn-off-ipv4-on-6-june-2014-for-one-day/
This is a terrible idea which will cause IPv6 to be associated with
gratuitous breakage.
Nick
--
Dick Visser
System Networking Engineer
TERENA
[mailto:ipv6-ops-bounces+evyncke=cisco@lists.cluenet.de] On
Behalf Of Dick Visser
Sent: lundi 25 novembre 2013 14:20
To: ipv6-ops@lists.cluenet.de
Subject: 'Upgrading' NAT64 to 464XLAT?
hi guys
We've been running a NAT64/DNS64 set-up for a while now on some parts
of
our office network
bytes:16746 (16.7 KB) TX bytes:16746 (16.7 KB)
Any idea how to get rid of it?
This is a server, and I don't want privacy/security extensions, just
the manually configured address.
Thanks!!!
--
Dick Visser
System Networking Engineer
TERENA Secretariat
Singel 468 D, 1017 AW Amsterdam
