Re: SV: SV: SV: CPE Residential IPv6 Security Poll

2016-10-01 Thread Daniel Roesen
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 01:50:07PM +0200, e.vanu...@avm.de wrote: > CU at BBWF ;-) We are building CPE with IPv6 on board. Which still can't even do static IPv6 routes or open firewall for adresses in prefixes not directly connected. Example: getting a /48 from upstream, either statically

Re: SV: SV: SV: CPE Residential IPv6 Security Poll

2016-09-29 Thread Holger Zuleger
On 29.09.2016 14:28, Thomas Schäfer wrote: > Am 29.09.2016 um 13:50 schrieb e.vanu...@avm.de: >> CU at BBWF ;-) We are building CPE with IPv6 on board. >> >> https://tmt.knect365.com/bbwf/sponsors/avm >> >> Eric > > Without IPv6-support for vpn, without configurable firewall for > dhcpv6-pd,

Re: SV: SV: SV: CPE Residential IPv6 Security Poll

2016-09-29 Thread Thomas Schäfer
Am 29.09.2016 um 13:50 schrieb e.vanu...@avm.de: CU at BBWF ;-) We are building CPE with IPv6 on board. https://tmt.knect365.com/bbwf/sponsors/avm Eric Without IPv6-support for vpn, without configurable firewall for dhcpv6-pd, without the ability to disable IPv4-myfritz-DNS-entries. Some

Re: SV: SV: SV: CPE Residential IPv6 Security Poll

2016-09-29 Thread e . vanuden
CU at BBWF ;-) We are building CPE with IPv6 on board. https://tmt.knect365.com/bbwf/sponsors/avm Eric Von:<erik.tarald...@telenor.com> An: <ragnar.anfin...@altibox.no> Kopie: ipv6-ops@lists.cluenet.de Datum: 29-09-2016 11:27 Betreff: SV: SV: SV: CPE Resi

SV: SV: SV: CPE Residential IPv6 Security Poll

2016-09-29 Thread erik.taraldsen
>>And just to trow this conversation futher of, anybody else here coming to >>BBWF this year? > > I’ll be there... Beers? Good idea. Any non-Norwegians who would like to join? :) -E

Re: SV: SV: CPE Residential IPv6 Security Poll

2016-09-28 Thread Ted Mittelstaedt
This is a flawed "argument of futility" The reality is that people are fundamentally lazy - if they were hard workers and industrious they wouldn't be trying to make a living off the backs of other people's work. They wouldn't be stealing and the ones not stealing wouldn't be taking the lazy

Re: SV: SV: CPE Residential IPv6 Security Poll

2016-09-25 Thread Roger Jørgensen
On Sun, 25 Sep 2016 07:08:46 +, erik.tarald...@telenor.com wrote: 1) In theory you are right. In practise it is not that black and white. We never buy an excisting product, we buy an future product which has to be developed for us. That include physical features which may not have beed

SV: SV: CPE Residential IPv6 Security Poll

2016-09-25 Thread erik.taraldsen
1) In theory you are right. In practise it is not that black and white. We never buy an excisting product, we buy an future product which has to be developed for us. That include physical features which may not have beed release from Broadcom yet (11ac 3x3 we were the first mass order from