Hi,
> For what it's worth, the Swisscom approach seems sensible to me. At
> least if I understand it correctly, in that they by default only block
> ports associated with application protocols known to be insecure, meant
> for home network use only, etc. All other ports and protocols not on
> the
On Mon, 26 Sep 2016, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
Well there is an answer to that. Instead of paying your development
team to do a from-scratch build, you can just have them port over dd-wrt
or openwrt. Both of these router firmwares are most likely tremendously
advanced over anything your CPE
Lorenzo Colitti wrote:
> Surely there's got to be a better solution here than
> lowest-common-denominator engineering, a.k.a., "design your product for
> your least knowledgeable customer"?
sensible secure defaults for grandma + "Advanced" tab on CPE
configuration page for 10yo grandchild?
Nick
Hello,
Thank you for your email. Are you referring to an order placed at the Valve Store? If this is regarding an in-game issue we kindly ask that you contact Steam Support directly as we are unable to help with any inquiries not regarding orders placed on http://valvestore.welovefine.com/.
CC: Benedikt Stockebrand <b...@stepladder-it.com>, IPv6 Ops list
<ipv6-ops@lists.cluenet.de>, "Anfinsen, Ragnar" <ragnar.anfin...@altibox.no>
Asunto: Re: CPE Residential IPv6 Security Poll
Hi,
Thanks Jordi. And yes, hindsight is always easy!
It would be
Ted Mittelstaedt writes:
> This kind of mirrors the "default" security policy on IPv4 CPEs (since
> those CPE's have NAT automatically turned on which creates a "block in,
> permit out" kind of approach.) so I'm not sure why you would want to
> default it to being different for
When we were still doing DSL I brought IPv6 online, but the only way our
customers could access it was to have the DSL modem/CPE in bridged mode,
and run their own router which was IPv6 compliant. Thus the "CPE"
security policy was whatever the router vendor defaulted. Our
observation was
hey,
I guess none of the users know they are using IPv6 around 75-80% of
the time internal, or 20-30% on their external traffic either:-)
Indeed. I've been spreading knowledge about our deployment to our
customers and most of them have been amazed that they had no idea :) But
they have
On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 12:32:27 +, Anfinsen, Ragnar wrote:
Hi all.
In light of a new discussion blossoming in Norway, we are curious
about the IPv6 security policy different ISP’s has adopted. So it
would be very helpful if you could do a quick response, either here
or
directly to me, on the